Good Game Bad Game [vs Tottenham Hotspur]

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Good Game Bad Game [vs Tottenham Hotspur]
There were too many mediocre players out there on this occasion for me to even to attempt to split them between those who played well and those who didn’t. This team played as if they didn’t know each other – which, from a playing perspective, is true – and as a result every aspect of Liverpool’s game failed to click.

Faced with Tottenham Hotspur, a team riding the confidence wave and with practically the first eleven out there, there was only going to be one conclusion.

Yet the nagging doubt at the back of my head is that, had Liverpool been fractionally more careful then they could have won this. But they weren’t and that’s that.

As I said in the introduction, there were too many mediocre performances. Worryingly, these didn’t come from the youngsters like Damien Plessis and Nabil El Zhar both of whom had decent games in my mind, but rather from people like Philip Degen and Andrea Dossena.

The two full-backs were atrocious which can turn out to be a significant problem. The concept of defending seems alien to Dossena and it was telling that, when Insua came on, it was the Argentine who slotted in at left-back.

As for Degen: what can you say? I struggle to think of a player who has played a worse game than he did against Spurs. Of course, it is still early on and all that but let’s just say that I’m hoping that his contract only covered one season. If I were Stephen Darby, I’d be knocking on Benitez’s door this morning asking why a player as limited as Degen was ahead of me.

Incidentally, both Darby and Insua looked good when they came on. Question is: how ready is Benitez to play them instead of the players that he brought in for a considerable amount of money? Not that I want to turn this into a debate about Liverpool’s youngsters and how they compare to Arsenal’s which unavoidably some will try to do this morning.

Yet perhaps the most worrying (although a better word is probably frustrating) aspect of the night was Ryan Babel’s form. The Dutchman clearly has lost a bit of spark and performances levels have slipped lately. Against Tottenham he played like a petulant boy, eager on doing everything on his own and in doing so he kept going down blind alleys.

I’m sure that Rafa will take some pointers from this game with the main one being that the squad isn’t that good but at the end of the day this was the League Cup and if elimination is the price that Liverpool have to pay for resting some of key players then so be it.

11 comments:

Anonymous 2:11 PM  

True Spurs had a more recognisable 11 and bench than you lot (I had never heard of a few of yours!) but we did rest King, Woodgate, Modric, Jenas, Bentley and Bent, so it wasn't really a first choice 11.

Anonymous 2:14 PM  

Spurs first choice team - hardly, sour grapes Scousers.

PS Can we play you every week?

Anonymous 2:15 PM  

Just to correct you - Spurs made 7 changes from the Man City game so hardly the Spurs first team!

Anonymous 2:17 PM  

Practicaly a first eleven?
HR made SEVEN changes to the team that played Man City last week....that comment makes you sound a bit like a bitter and twisted Gooner

CrazierFrampbell 2:17 PM  

Tottenham had their first team out?
King, Woodgate, Hutton, Bentley, Jenas, Modric, Bent all left out.
Perhaps we just have more depth in out squad?

Anonymous 2:22 PM  

"Practically their first team"?sorry, but Spurs made 7 changes from the team that beat Liverpool at the weekend, with arguably the heart of the side out- Jenas, King Bentley, Bent, Modric. That's seven changes....

Thought you played very well at the weekend and were mugged, but last night you were really poor.

Anonymous 2:41 PM  

Hi Paul. Dunno if you have seen comments above but it was far from Spurs best XI :)
Not sure if Keane would get a game in Spurs side if he was to turn up at the Lane once more

Anonymous 2:46 PM  

Spurs first team out? err dont think so our reserves tonked yours fair and square you were lucky to get away with just four aswell could of been ten. Difference between Pool first team and 2nd team is astonishing.

Anonymous 2:47 PM  

Hadn't it been for sloppy defending you feel you could have nicked it??

Besides the two goals you scored, which was solely due to horrible goalkeeping, what else did you create??

Anonymous 4:37 PM  

Have to agree with all the other posters. Football is a squad game and spurs proved there squad is better than ours. God knows what the score could have been had they played modric and bent.

We have to take this result on the chin and say spurs were the better team on the night and have a bigger and better squad overall. I think our first 11 is stronger but to be fair to spurs, if they had stevie g and torres up front they would be top of the league and we would be mid table.

Now lets concentrate on the league.

Anonymous 6:20 PM  

Spurs easily deserved to win and i have to agree with the poster who said that the difference between our first and second team is astonishing. Too many of those given a chance clearly aren't up to scratch.

Also think that zonal marking doesn't lend itself to wholesale changes at the back given the reliance on being a cohesive unit as opposed to each man having an essentially individual job to do.

Fair play to spurs and Redknapp in particular but certainly not overly concerned by either of these defeats in the long run.

About This Blog

A Liverpool Thing offers opinions and views about the goings on at Liverpool FC.

About

My Photo
Paul Grech
Apart from beeing a freelance journalist who has written for a number of publications, Paul Grech is the athletics correspondent for The Times of Malta and one of the regular writers for www.squarefootball.net
View my complete profile

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP